Jim Freeman Wake-up Call

Share this post
Rhetoric on Capitalism vs Socialism Falls to Stupidism
www.jim-freeman.com

Rhetoric on Capitalism vs Socialism Falls to Stupidism

Jim Freeman
May 9, 2019
Share this post
Rhetoric on Capitalism vs Socialism Falls to Stupidism
www.jim-freeman.com

You won’t find stupidism in a dictionary, so don’t bother

looking. I just invented it.

There are many great

attributes to Capitalism, but it needs controls (and once had them).

Four out of the five best

nations in which to live, according to residents, are socialistic: Canada (no),

Sweden (yes), Denmark (yes), Norway (yes) and Finland (yes).

Now you can the positives and negatives on both sides and

discuss them intelligently, but all too often that’s when stupidism rears its

ugly head. And ugly it is.

Shall we fiddle with definitions?

One calls socialism ‘a political and economic theory of social

organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and

exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.’

Catch that owned or regulated part? Community as a whole doesn’t own the interstate highways, rural

electrification, social security, Medicare or our over-stuffed military. But

government does regulate them, or at

least tries to. In the case of the

military and privately held banks, it’s not doing all that well.

In the case of the military, it can’t even account for $21 trillion of Pentagon

financial transactions.  They could not

be traced, documented, or explained,

even though it’s required by law.

Our privately held banks, $700 billion you think? Nomi

Prins (author, journalist and public speaker) uncovers the hush-hush programs

and crunches the hidden numbers to calculate the shocking actual size of the

bailout: $14.4 trillion and counting.

The Marxist definition of

Socialism that twists the knickers of stupidism is ‘a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the

realization of Communism.’

By god that would smoke my

shorts as well, but it isn’t happening.

Nowhere, even in the most figmented of imaginations, is anything of the kind on

the menu or about to be added as a side-dish.

Lets take the Green

New Deal as an example, because the stupidest arguments that it will keep

us all from flying and mandate no more beef are simply off the wall. Although

still in its developmental stage, here’s what it basically hopes to accomplish.

Fund

sustainable, renewable energy to make America 100%

fossil-fuel free by the very quickest means possible. Probably 15 million union scale jobs in that,

with ownership in private hands. Positive environmental impact beyond compare.

High-speed

rail,

operated by private transportation companies (including airlines) and probably built

in the median of the interstate highways. We already own this land, there are

no grade crossings and it already has access central-city to central-city

across the nation. Another 15 million jobs? Most likely.

Guarantee

clean air, fresh water and non-toxic food. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

are already tasked with these concerns. But they’ve been ignored, defunded and

politically neutered in favor of corporate profits. We frack, build lakes of

animal waste, allow growth hormones and antibiotics in meat and spray

carcinogens on fruits and vegetables. All we need do is fund and empower those

who are currently handcuffed and frustrated.

Okay smartass, how you gonna pay for all this? Even the American Action Forum estimates that,

between 2020 and 2029, the energy and environmental components of the Green New

Deal would cost $8.3 trillion to $12.3 trillion. Have I cherry-picked a liberal

source? Hardly.

The American Action Forum is a

nonprofit issue advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. which promotes center right public policy. They promote

innovative, free-market solutions to

create a smaller, smarter government.  AAF sources their information to credible

sources.

But I take your point, so let’s double the numbers.

Everything seems to double on large programs. $16 to $25 trillion is now the

number we’ll deal with. Okay? Are we at least talking to one another now?

Between the Pentagon and the

Big Banks, we’ve already pissed $35 trillion down the toilet since 2007 and

gotten damned little for the effort. The banks are being sued right and left

for fraud against their customers and the Pentagon hasn’t won a war since WWII.

Even so, it’s a major amount

of dough and we must find it and one

way or another it must be borrowed. Stay with me.

There are two kinds of national debt: 1) money spent for

running the country, like the military, social welfare programs and federal

employees to run everything. When they exceed taxes and other income, the

national debt increases and that’s

unsustainable. Gotta watch those costs like a hawk. Printing money to

overcome those costs is inflationary as hell and you can’t outrun inflation.

2) is money spent on assets

like infrastructure and programs that leave us stronger as a nation, such as higher wages, rebuilding the middle

class, reducing environmental threats and thereby allowing capitalism to thrive. Those are investments instead of wild-eyed spending. You can print money for investment

in assets, because there’s something left at the end of the print-run.

Does it make sense to borrow

(in this case print) money to booze it up and live large? Hardly. But the wise

man borrows to invest, particularly

when that investment is sound and may even save his life.

Enough noodling around. If we

don’t move to save this planet, we’re all

dead. Even now, it will never recover to what we expect to leave our children. On

average over the past 10,000 years, nine species have gone extinct every

century.  In the last century alone, 500

species have already left this earth and a million

more are expected to die off before the end of this one.

The moral (if there is such a thing) is don’t listen to or

fall victim to stupidism. We need to talk

and even more that that, we need to listen.

And even more than the even more of that

even more, we need to act.

Quickly.

Share this post
Rhetoric on Capitalism vs Socialism Falls to Stupidism
www.jim-freeman.com
Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 Jim Freeman
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing